[PD-dev] [ pure-data-Patches-3497084 ] fix for open_via_path() declaration headfizz

SourceForge.net noreply at sourceforge.net
Tue Mar 6 16:34:32 CET 2012


Patches item #3497084, was opened at 2012-03-05 09:41
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mathieubouchard
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=478072&aid=3497084&group_id=55736

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: puredata-dev
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 7
Private: No
Submitted By: IOhannes m zmölnig (zmoelnig)
Assigned to: Miller Puckette (millerpuckette)
Summary: fix for open_via_path() declaration headfizz

Initial Comment:
m_pd.h says that the parameters for open_via_path() are: "open_via_path(name, ext, dir, ...)"

otoh, s_path.c implements the function as "open_via_path(dir, name, ext,...)"
also the function is used as (dir, name, ext,...) throughout the code.

the attached cosmetic patch fixes the function declaration in m_pd.h, so i don't get headfizz whenever i try to find out why i'm using the function correctly.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mathieu BOUCHARD (mathieubouchard)
Date: 2012-03-06 07:34

Message:
Just imagine that the ministry of transportation puts the wrong signs on
the autobahn. When it's time to fix them, they call the change
«cosmetic». So, of course, they ask a beautician to take care of it.

Do any changes to the docs also count as «cosmetic» ?

Because help-intro.pd always listed classes that never existed, such as
[powtorms~] and [rmstopow~]. I suppose that it's cosmetic too ?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=478072&aid=3497084&group_id=55736



More information about the Pd-dev mailing list