[PD-dev] converting OSCx to a template library

[IOhannes m zmölnig]

On 10/19/2012 03:02 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>> why would you want to keep OSCx alive?
>> i would rather entirely remove this buggy and un-maintained (as in: upstream,
>> not within PdX) library from any distribution.
>
> Its still widely used and still the easiest way to use OSC, albeit in a
> limited way.  If someone makes comparably easy way to use OSC, then I see no
> reason to keep this one.

here's 2 abstractions that implement OSCx's [sendOSC] and [dumpOSC] in 
terms of vanilla/mrpeach objects.

[OSCroute] cannot really be implemented in vanilla due to it's 
multi-outlet nature. otoh, [routeOSC] is compatible with [OSCroute] 
(apart from the name).


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: dumpOSC.pd
Type: text/x-puredata
Size: 783 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-dev/attachments/20121019/4b1b9fa8/attachment.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: sendOSC.pd
Type: text/x-puredata
Size: 633 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-dev/attachments/20121019/4b1b9fa8/attachment-0001.bin>