[PD-dev] converting OSCx to a template library

Hans-Christoph Steiner hans at at.or.at
Sat Oct 20 16:17:38 CEST 2012


On 10/20/2012 04:07 AM, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
> On 10/20/2012 01:26 AM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>> I'm not going to take on the maintenance of those patches, so just copying
>> them into Pd-extended is not an option.  I'm think Pd-extended should have an
>> 'oscx' compatible library , and 'oscx' is already there, tested, etc.
> 
> "etc" means "known to be buggy & unmaintained".
> 
> i'm not arguing against OSCx because of it's architectural flaws but because
> it's not working as it should.

I'd happily ditch it if there was a drop in replacement.  For example, I've
had many students come to me with the most popular Processing <--> Pd starter
patch, and its based on oscx.  If it wasn't include, that patch would not work
at all.  So buggy but working is still better than not at all.

.hc



More information about the Pd-dev mailing list