[PD-dev] converting OSCx to a template library
Jonathan Wilkes
jancsika at yahoo.com
Sat Oct 20 22:34:52 CEST 2012
----- Original Message -----
> From: Hans-Christoph Steiner <hans at at.or.at>
> To: pd-dev at iem.at
> Cc:
> Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2012 1:13 PM
> Subject: Re: [PD-dev] converting OSCx to a template library
>
> On 10/20/2012 11:56 AM, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
>> On 10/20/2012 04:17 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>>>
>>> I'd happily ditch it if there was a drop in replacement. For
> example, I've
>>> had many students come to me with the most popular
> Processing<--> Pd starter
>>> patch, and its based on oscx. If it wasn't include, that patch
> would not work
>>> at all. So buggy but working is still better than not at all.
>>
>> so what is wrong with my patches? they _are_ drop-in replacements.
>>
>> if those students use PdX (with [initbang]) one could even writen
> [OSCroute]
>> wrapper.
>
> I don't know if anything is wrong with them or not, or whether they are
> fully
> compatible or not. I can't take on the maintenance of any more libraries,
> so
> I'm not going to test them. I encourage you to take it on if you think its
> important. oscx is there and already included, that's my point.
Isn't he just fixing the existing library?
>
> .hc
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-dev mailing list
> Pd-dev at iem.at
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-dev/attachments/20121020/ec8ca3d8/attachment.htm>
More information about the Pd-dev
mailing list