[PD-dev] converting OSCx to a template library

Jonathan Wilkes jancsika at yahoo.com
Sat Oct 20 22:34:52 CEST 2012


----- Original Message -----

> From: Hans-Christoph Steiner <hans at at.or.at>
> To: pd-dev at iem.at
> Cc: 
> Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2012 1:13 PM
> Subject: Re: [PD-dev] converting OSCx to a template library
> 
> On 10/20/2012 11:56 AM, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
>>  On 10/20/2012 04:17 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>>> 
>>>  I'd happily ditch it if there was a drop in replacement.  For 
> example, I've
>>>  had many students come to me with the most popular 
> Processing<-->  Pd starter
>>>  patch, and its based on oscx.  If it wasn't include, that patch 
> would not work
>>>  at all.  So buggy but working is still better than not at all.
>> 
>>  so what is wrong with my patches? they _are_ drop-in replacements.
>> 
>>  if those students use PdX (with [initbang]) one could even writen 
> [OSCroute]
>>  wrapper.
> 
> I don't know if anything is wrong with them or not, or whether they are 
> fully
> compatible or not.  I can't take on the maintenance of any more libraries, 
> so
> I'm not going to test them.  I encourage you to take it on if you think its
> important.  oscx is there and already included, that's my point.

Isn't he just fixing the existing library?

> 
> .hc
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-dev mailing list
> Pd-dev at iem.at
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-dev/attachments/20121020/ec8ca3d8/attachment.htm>


More information about the Pd-dev mailing list