[PD-dev] stackoverflow tag

[Jonathan Wilkes]

----- Original Message -----

> From: Thomas Mayer <thomas at residuum.org>
> To: pd-dev at iem.at
> Cc: 
> Sent: Tuesday, January 8, 2013 8:18 PM
> Subject: Re: [PD-dev] stackoverflow tag
> 
> OK, so here is the question (and the tag):
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/14226869/how-to-keep-audio-and-video-gem-synchronised

*Ping*

And your first reply suggests asking back here on the list!

*Pong*

But I'd imagine Pd-related questions of a more general nature would
benefit from being asked to a wider audience like that.

-Jonathan

> 
> On 08.01.2013 23:05, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>> 
>>  Anyone on Stack Overflow with more than 1500 reputation?  If so, please 
> create
>>  a "puredata" or "pd" tag, you need at least that many 
> points to be allowed to
>>  do so.
>> 
>>  http://stackoverflow.com/privileges/create-tags
>> 
>>  The question is, I guess, should the official tag be 'puredata' so 
> we can beat
>>  IBM to the punch, or 'pd'.  I think 'puredata' is clearer.
>> 
>>  .hc
>> 
>>  _______________________________________________
>>  Pd-dev mailing list
>>  Pd-dev at iem.at
>>  http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
> 
> 
> -- 
> "We left all that stuff out. If there's an error, we have this
> routine called panic, and when it is called, the machine crashes,
> and you holler down the hall, 'Hey, reboot it.'" (Dennis Ritchie)
> http://www.residuum.org/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-dev mailing list
> Pd-dev at iem.at
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
>