[PD-dev] SIGPIPE on iemnet's tcpserver

[Antoine Villeret]

hi,

thanks for that,

I'm currently testing the Iohannes version that fix the SIGPIPE crash
I realized my patches crash more often since I'm using [tcpserver],
this is why I tested it alone a lot and find some issues i tried to overcome
I think I will run the server in a separate instance of Pd to avoid crash
and blocked ports

+
a

--
do it yourself
http://antoine.villeret.free.fr


2013/7/4 Roman Haefeli <reduzent at gmail.com>

> On Don, 2013-07-04 at 14:20 +0200, Antoine Villeret wrote:
> > ok thanks for the explanation
> >
> >
> > so, for now, there is now way to setup a working [udpserver] in pd
> > right ?
> > if so, I will stay with [tcpserver] even if I don't need tcp...
>
> I think that is your best bet.
>
> I'm still not quite clear what problems you're trying to overcome. Have
> you tried my patches? Do they work? If not, in what way do they fail?
>
> In the meanwhile I came to the conclusion it's probably not worth
> putting too much time into a server failure proof design. If the sole
> purpose of the server is to act as a message relay between clients, it
> will most likely run stable enough. For instance, the netpd server which
> is also basically a relay for messages usually runs for months without
> crashing. If you have a stable server, many of the workarounds you had
> to implement are not necessary. 'Simple' often equals stable.
>
> Roman
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-dev mailing list
> Pd-dev at iem.at
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-dev/attachments/20130705/61c7708c/attachment.htm>