[PD-dev] Question about multi-arch Mac OS X - is 32-Bit still around?
megrimm at gmail.com
Sat Feb 22 23:37:51 CET 2014
>> Fuck it. I'll do it. It'll be a "reverse kickstarter".
your in the states right? is there now other way to fund such and endeavor?
artist grant, academia, etc?
>> pick out the code later today.
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 10:48 AM, Dan Wilcox <danomatika at gmail.com> wrote:
> Fuck it. I'll do it. It'll be a "reverse kickstarter". I've been thinking
> about it for a while, but I frankly don't use GEM for much so haven't had
> to "scratch that itch". I'll pick out the code later today. I too am tired
> of seeing these requests go unanswered year after year ...
> On Feb 17, 2014, at 6:00 AM, pd-dev-request at iem.at wrote:
> *From: *Hans-Christoph Steiner <hans at at.or.at>
> *Subject: **Re: [PD-dev] Question about multi-arch Mac OS X - is 32-Bit
> still around?*
> *Date: *February 16, 2014 at 11:52:37 PM EST
> *To: *me.grimm <megrimm at gmail.com>
> *Cc: *IOhannes m zmölnig <zmoelnig at iem.at>, pd-dev at iem.at
> At this point, the thing to do is probably raise money to pay someone to
> do it.
> On Jan 12, 2014, at 1:42 PM, me.grimm wrote:
> >>admittedly this is an issue of Gem, but little can be done about it.
> except getting a working 64-bit version of Gem.
> I have it compiled on 64-bit w/ gmerlin for pix_film but native filmQTKIT
> would be better. there has been some work done on this for Max and oFX that
> might be useful code to port to Gem since last time i looked at this a
> couple years ago:
> see https://github.com/brianchasalow/jit.BC.QTKit &
> unfortunately I am not skilled or organized enough to implement myself but
> I would be happy to help!!! I would love to get my students using 64-bit pd
> builds on their macs (all 50 of them this semester have macs)
> On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 12:33 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig <zmoelnig at iem.at>
>> On 2014-01-11 01:08, Thomas Mayer wrote:
>> > So: Is 32-Bit on Mac OS X still around?
>> due to QuickTime issues, Gem on OSX is still 32bit only. this means that
>> whoever wants to run Gem on OSX, will need to use a 32bit version of Pd
>> and not being able to run a 64bit-only purest json.
>> admittedly this is an issue of Gem, but little can be done about it.
> Dan Wilcox
m.e.grimm | m.f.a | ed.m.
megrimm at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Pd-dev