[PD-dev] Pd-extended EOL?
Roman Haefeli
reduzent at gmail.com
Thu Oct 1 09:38:45 CEST 2015
On Thu, 2015-10-01 at 09:48 +0800, Chris McCormick wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> On 01/10/15 00:25, Dan Wilcox wrote:
> > Since Pd-Extended is basically EOL at this point, maybe we should
> > discuss more formal plans on a transition to Pd-vanilla+deken.
>
> I think the main outstanding issue is whether deken functions correctly
> on Windows. Roman did some testing and I think there were some
> outstanding issues but my memory is blurry.
As far as I can tell, there are no out-standing issues on Windows
regarding deken. Two things have been fixed that affected the usage of
deken:
* Some standard paths were missing so that deken wasn't found on newer
Windows' (fixed with commit 7fb6311c)
* [declare -stdpath] did not work on Windows (fixed with commit 1b7af3c)
I remember that deken on Windows did not automatically unzip the
packages, but only download them. Is that still the case? On my test
machine I installed a bunch of unix-y toos for building (git bash,
mingw, etc.) and then auto-unzipping worked, though I haven't
investigated what exactly made it work. I guess some installer came with
a unzip binary. Is that something that you would like to address?
Roman
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-dev/attachments/20151001/a294795a/attachment.sig>
More information about the Pd-dev
mailing list