[PD-dev] Pd-extended EOL?

Dan Wilcox danomatika at gmail.com
Fri Oct 2 20:42:10 CEST 2015


Right. I guess that would go under “list of things to do to reach parity”. :D

--------
Dan Wilcox
@danomatika <https://twitter.com/danomatika>
danomatika.com <http://danomatika.com/>
robotcowboy.com <http://robotcowboy.com/>
> On Sep 30, 2015, at 7:48 PM, Chris McCormick <chris at mccormick.cx> wrote:
> 
> Hi Dan,
> 
> On 01/10/15 00:25, Dan Wilcox wrote:
>> Since Pd-Extended is basically EOL at this point, maybe we should
>> discuss more formal plans on a transition to Pd-vanilla+deken.
> 
> I think the main outstanding issue is whether deken functions correctly on Windows. Roman did some testing and I think there were some outstanding issues but my memory is blurry.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Chris.
> 
> -- 
> http://mccormick.cx/

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-dev/attachments/20151002/35ee00f3/attachment.html>


More information about the Pd-dev mailing list