[PD-dev] Pd-extended EOL?

[Dan Wilcox]

Yeah, that’s what I mean. Basically so people will stop downloading an out of date extended if there is an easy way to get the same/similar functionality from a much newer version of vanilla+externals. Judging from the continued extended bug reports of things which are generally fixed in vanilla, I’m thinking it would be a good idea to see what’s needed for a transition and start that more formal conversation.

--------
Dan Wilcox
@danomatika <https://twitter.com/danomatika>
danomatika.com <http://danomatika.com/>
robotcowboy.com <http://robotcowboy.com/>
> On Oct 1, 2015, at 4:00 AM, pd-dev-request at lists.iem.at wrote:
> 
> If by 'relative parity' you mean availability of all the externals the
> last version of Pd-extended came with, this might have been reached
> already. Search for 'extended' in deken. It shows a lot of (all?)
> externals directly packaged from Pd-extended. Many thanks to IOhannes
> for uploading all those.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-dev/attachments/20151002/4da5d813/attachment.html>