[PD-dev] moving to git

[IOhannes m zmölnig]

On 10/16/2015 12:24 AM, Jonathan Wilkes via Pd-dev wrote:
> Oh, those are both absolutely insecure by default.

"both"?

>   You (and Sourceforge) 
> default to insecure connections.  Sourceforge only forces the encryption when 
> the user needs to write something.  
>  
> Nevertheless, I think it's cases like this one which "Let's Encrypt" is designed to solve.  I'm happy to leave it to them to eventually lift the work you've done 
> up into the 21st century.
> 

rather than keep on ranting, you could have just cloned the repositories
via https (after checking the BIG RED WARNING and assuring that it
indeed is a valid certificate from a trusted party that just happens to
use the wrong hostname) into your super-secret gitlab instance at OSUOSL
which does everything better and not only uses cryptography but also
21st century steganography to protect everybody's privacy.

fgmard
IOhannes


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-dev/attachments/20151016/69283694/attachment.sig>