[PD-dev] moving to git

[Jonathan Wilkes]

Hi Roman,If you do that over http then you don't have any way of knowing whether the 
data that you requested is the data that you get back.
If you're going to be using this system, I'd suggest just hopping on the git 
user list and asking what is the best protocol to use by default for a publicly 
accessible repo of plugins in a free software community that isn't full of 
security experts.

If they suggest a setup like what IOhannes has implemented, then ignore 
everything I've written.  If not, then you (or someone else who isn't me) might 
attempt revisiting this issue.
-Jonathan
  


   

  On Friday, October 16, 2015 8:42 AM, Roman Haefeli <reduzent at gmail.com> wrote:
   

 On Wed, 2015-10-14 at 16:15 +0200, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
> On 2015-07-30 11:05, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
> > ad #3
> > i really would like to split that huge repository into small projects
> > (mainly: per-library).
> > i've already started working on this on [1], which is nothing much to
> > show yet, but in the end it should document the process and provide a
> > way to re-play the conversion.
> > 
> 
> so i've done a first transition.
> 
> all the git-repositories can be found at
> 
>  http://git.puredata.info/cgit/svn2git/

Great! Many thanks for all the effort. 

> they are browsable and can be cloned directly from the webpage.
> however, these repos are meant as starting points, so we do not provide
> *any write* access.

Ok, so what's the fuzz about non-secure connections when the repo's
purpose is to _clone_ from it?

Roman
_______________________________________________
Pd-dev mailing list
Pd-dev at lists.iem.at
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev


  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-dev/attachments/20151016/74d76c4d/attachment-0001.html>