[PD-dev] Pd-extended EOL?

[IOhannes m zmoelnig]

hi hans,

great to hear from you!

On 2015-11-09 14:49, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> FYI, for anyone interested, it would not be hard to do a Pd-extended update if it is just a matter of updating the libraries.

what i would find more interesting: how hard would it be to update the
PdX-core to Pd-0.47? that is, the patcheset against Pd-vanilla.

i once had a look at the PdX repository (which is based on miller's
vanilla Pd), but even for PdX-0.43 the two repositories had diverged by
(iirc) a few hundred commits, which makes it highly impractical to
rebase/reapply/cherry-pick.

is there any meta-description available of the diffs between PdX and Pd?

fgmadsr
IOhannes

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-dev/attachments/20151109/b3082087/attachment.sig>