[PD-dev] Pd-extended EOL?

IOhannes m zmölnig zmoelnig at iem.at
Mon Nov 9 20:55:52 CET 2015


On 11/09/2015 08:44 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> For a long time, I used a git workflow that kept the Pd-extended changes as a set of patches on top of vanilla, you can see that in the 'patch_series' branch.  You can see that in the history.  I ultimately abandoned that because there were too many commits from vanilla that I had to remove in order to keep things working.  So I switched to treating vanilla as a source of patches which I included into the pd-extended master.  I regularly submitted patches that didn't rely on the Pd-extended stuff to the patch tracker.  Many of those were ignored for years.  I have no idea the current state of them.
[...]

thanks for clarification.

gmadsr
IOhannes

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-dev/attachments/20151109/74664565/attachment.sig>


More information about the Pd-dev mailing list