[PD-dev] Pd-extended EOL?
IOhannes m zmölnig
zmoelnig at iem.at
Mon Nov 9 20:55:52 CET 2015
On 11/09/2015 08:44 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> For a long time, I used a git workflow that kept the Pd-extended changes as a set of patches on top of vanilla, you can see that in the 'patch_series' branch. You can see that in the history. I ultimately abandoned that because there were too many commits from vanilla that I had to remove in order to keep things working. So I switched to treating vanilla as a source of patches which I included into the pd-extended master. I regularly submitted patches that didn't rely on the Pd-extended stuff to the patch tracker. Many of those were ignored for years. I have no idea the current state of them.
[...]
thanks for clarification.
gmadsr
IOhannes
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-dev/attachments/20151109/74664565/attachment.sig>
More information about the Pd-dev
mailing list