[PD-dev] Pd-extended EOL?
Hans-Christoph Steiner
hans at at.or.at
Mon Nov 9 23:27:45 CET 2015
On Nov 9, 2015, at 8:55 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
> On 11/09/2015 08:44 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>> For a long time, I used a git workflow that kept the Pd-extended changes as a set of patches on top of vanilla, you can see that in the 'patch_series' branch. You can see that in the history. I ultimately abandoned that because there were too many commits from vanilla that I had to remove in order to keep things working. So I switched to treating vanilla as a source of patches which I included into the pd-extended master. I regularly submitted patches that didn't rely on the Pd-extended stuff to the patch tracker. Many of those were ignored for years. I have no idea the current state of them.
> [...]
>
> thanks for clarification.
The big blocker for me on merging new code from vanilla is what to do with the portaudio stuff. Pd-extended has a bunch of changes, I believe mostly from you, IOhannes. If memory serves me, there were also issues with vanilla's support of OSX audio output. The audio I/O stuff I've never really followed so well.
.hc
More information about the Pd-dev
mailing list