[PD-dev] [PD] can't load abstractions using fuill pathname?

[IOhannes m zmoelnig]

On 2016-04-25 03:41, Miller Puckette wrote:
> I think this is one for Iohannes...

indeed.
thanks for the report.

> 
> I can't seem to load abstractions by typing the full pathname anymore...
> e.g. [/tmp/output~] fails, even if /tmp/output~.pd exists.  I get
> 
> maximum object loading depth 1000 reached
>  /tmp/output~
> ... couldn't create
> 
> I tried fixing s_path.c to make it load but couldn't figure out what was
> going on.

attached you find a patch that fixes the issue with hopefully plenty of
explanation in the commit (and another issue related to the
double-loading-prevention).

fmgasdr
IOhannes
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0001-fixed-loading-of-abstractions-via-absolute-filename.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 2719 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-dev/attachments/20160425/6b2d6440/attachment.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0002-centrally-prevent-double-loading-of-fully-qualified-.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 2197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-dev/attachments/20160425/6b2d6440/attachment-0001.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-dev/attachments/20160425/6b2d6440/attachment.sig>