[PD-dev] DEFDACBLKSIZE and DEFSENDVS

[Giulio Moro]

I see you found my question, thanks for your responses.
Here is the error I get when DEFDACBLKSIZE is 8 and DEFSENDVS is 64 : error: throw~ out: vector size mismatch

I was getting similar errors when using [s~] [r~] or [catch~].
>also, the overhead with a blocksize of 8 is considerably higher than a
>blocksize of 64, so when using *heavy* Pd-patches you might hit
>performance problems sooner than later.

Where is the performance hit for DEFDACBLKSIZE = 8 ?I see how there could be a performance hit when using a smaller audio driver block size, but would there be much difference between, e.g. DEFDACBLKSIZE = 8 and DEFDACBLKSIZE = 64 if the audio driver block size is set to 64 in both cases?

Thanks,Giulio
 
      From: IOhannes m zmoelnig <zmoelnig at iem.at>
 To: pd-dev at lists.iem.at 
 Sent: Tuesday, 12 July 2016, 8:46
 Subject: Re: [PD-dev] DEFDACBLKSIZE and DEFSENDVS
   
On 2016-07-12 04:51, Giulio Moro via Pd-dev wrote:
> My original question was also about why it is defined in multiple places and why DEFSENDVS is defined separately, yet setting them to two different values gives errors.

was it? i don't see this question in your original mail.
also: what is the error you get?

fgamsdr
IOhannes


_______________________________________________
Pd-dev mailing list
Pd-dev at lists.iem.at
https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev


   
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-dev/attachments/20160712/89306e0c/attachment.html>