[PD-dev] Conflict: incoming OSC data and DSP on

[Roman Haefeli]

Just a wild guess: It looks like your localhost connection is slow for
some reason. Is there some anti virus software installed? If so, does
the problem still occur when anti virus is stopped?

Roman

On Mit, 2017-04-12 at 16:02 +0100, Niccolò Granieri wrote:
> > 
> > Does the attached modified version of your test patch still exhibit
> > the
> > problem?
> 
> Yes, same exact problem.
> 
> > 
> > On 12 Apr 2017, at 16:01, Roman Haefeli <reduzent at gmail.com> wrote:
> > 
> > Does the attached modified version of your test patch still exhibit
> > the
> > problem?
> > 
> > Roman
> > 
> > On Mit, 2017-04-12 at 13:02 +0100, Niccolò Granieri wrote:
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > I cannot with the same Pd version on Linux. I wonder whether it
> > > > is
> > > > related to the high refresh rate of the number boxes.
> > > > 
> > > > Does the GUI freeze still occur if the the update rate of the
> > > > number
> > > > boxes (not that of actual data going through the wire!) is
> > > > throttled? 
> > > Hi Roman, I'm not quite sure how I would throttle the number
> > > boxes,
> > > can you be more specific?
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Is wish more likely the bottleneck on some platforms, but not
> > > > on
> > > > others? Is wish using 100% of a CPU core when the freeze
> > > > happens?
> > > Actually Pd drops in CPU usage after the freeze happens. From 40%
> > > to
> > > 0,8%. But the GUI is completetly frozen and the audio has up to a
> > > 5second delay!
> > > 
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Pd-dev mailing list
> > > Pd-dev at lists.iem.at
> > > https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
> > > 
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > On 12 Apr 2017, at 12:55, Roman Haefeli <reduzent at gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > On Die, 2017-04-11 at 18:33 +0200, Damian Stewart wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > > Fwiw I can reproduce exactly the behaviour that Niccolò is
> > > > > seeing
> > > > > here. OSX 10.12.3, pd vanilla 0.47.1 64 bit.
> > > > I cannot with the same Pd version on Linux. I wonder whether it
> > > > is
> > > > related to the high refresh rate of the number boxes.
> > > > 
> > > > Does the GUI freeze still occur if the the update rate of the
> > > > number
> > > > boxes (not that of actual data going through the wire!) is
> > > > throttled? 
> > > > 
> > > > Is wish more likely the bottleneck on some platforms, but not
> > > > on
> > > > others? Is wish using 100% of a CPU core when the freeze
> > > > happens?
> > > > 
> > > > (Sorry if I'm repeating what IOhannes already said)
> > > > 
> > > > Roman
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > p.s.: Why is this on pd-dev?
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > On 11 Apr 2017, at 00:56, Niccolò Granieri
> > > > > > <granieriniccolo at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Hello Pd-dev mailing list,
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > I am writing, for the first time, to point out an issue I'm
> > > > > > having
> > > > > > with incoming OSC data in Pd and DSP being turned on.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > The problem occurs when, while receiving OSC data from
> > > > > > inside
> > > > > > my
> > > > > > machine (thus using a localhost), I turn on DSP. The OSC
> > > > > > data
> > > > > > stops
> > > > > > flowing until I don't turn the DSP off.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > The only workaround I found to solve this issue is to run
> > > > > > two
> > > > > > separate instances of Pd: the first one that will act as an
> > > > > > OSC
> > > > > > parser, not having the need to turn on DSP. Once the data
> > > > > > is
> > > > > > parsed, the data is sent to a second instance of Pd via
> > > > > > FUDI
> > > > > > protocol (netsend) where it can coexist with DSP on without
> > > > > > causing
> > > > > > any issues.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > This unfortunately brings up the amount of computing power
> > > > > > needed.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > I was wondering if anyone encountered the same problem
> > > > > > before,
> > > > > > and
> > > > > > if there was any better solution.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Thanks in advance, glad to be in this mailing list,
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Niccolò
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Pure Data 0.47.1 - 64 bit
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > Pd-dev mailing list
> > > > > > Pd-dev at lists.iem.at
> > > > > > https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Pd-dev mailing list
> > > > > Pd-dev at lists.iem.at
> > > > > https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Pd-dev mailing list
> > > > Pd-dev at lists.iem.at
> > > > https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
> > <Test_Patch_Automated_throttled.pd>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-dev/attachments/20170412/276de0d1/attachment-0001.sig>