[PD-dev] unable to load pdp library (mach-o, but wrong architecture)

IOhannes m zmoelnig zmoelnig at iem.at
Mon May 8 09:48:08 CEST 2017

(redirecting this to pd-list, as it is of general interest rather than
developer centric, even though a compiler is involved)

On 2017-05-08 02:13, cjniven wrote:
> The problem is both pdp and pd that I’ve compiled from source are built for my native architecture (x86_64), but the pre-compiled version of Pd-extended I’m trying to get pdp working with is i386.

Pd-extended is dead.

> If anyone can point me in the right direction, that would be appreciated — I need pdp to work so I can record Gem patches with a syphon server. 

why would you need pdp for that?

why can't you just:
- use Gem to record via syphon?
- use any other recording software for syphon [1]?


[1] http://syphon.v002.info/recorder/

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-dev/attachments/20170508/ec9b40ca/attachment.sig>

More information about the Pd-dev mailing list