[PD-dev] change in how declares are interpreted from within abstractions

[Antoine Rousseau]

could be helpful for anyone's abstraction library I guess...
And it won't break [declare]s anymore when turning a top-level patch to an
abstraction.
Great!



Antoine Rousseau
  http://www.metalu.net <http://metalu.net> __
http://www.metaluachahuter.com/
<http://www.metaluachahuter.com/compagnies/al1-ant1/>


2017-06-18 16:31 GMT+02:00 Dan Wilcox <danomatika at gmail.com>:

> I can definitely say this will be helpful for my abstraction libraries.
>
> To Pd dev:
>
> I just pushed a change that I believe to be a bug fix - now, [declare
> -path foo]
> inside an abstraction looks for a subdirectory "foo" relative to the
> directory
> that the abstraction was found in, not the calling patch.  I think this
> doesn't
> break anything but since search paths are so confusing I thought it a good
> idea
> to mention the change here in case anyone sees something wrong with it.
>
> cheers
> Miller
>
>
> --------
> Dan Wilcox
> @danomatika <http://twitter.com/danomatika>
> danomatika.com
> robotcowboy.com
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-dev mailing list
> Pd-dev at lists.iem.at
> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-dev/attachments/20170618/cd68a9ff/attachment.html>