[PD-dev] Pd-dev Digest, Vol 149, Issue 15

Dan Wilcox danomatika at gmail.com
Sun Aug 20 19:50:36 CEST 2017


Even if a lot of those changes come from Pd-extended? Kind of forward-back-porting?

In any case, I can see a clean diff between this project and the pure-data repository on Github...

> On Aug 20, 2017, at 10:09 AM, pd-dev-request at lists.iem.at wrote:
> 
> Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2017 08:09:42 +0000
> From: zmoelnig at iem.at <mailto:zmoelnig at iem.at>
> To: pd-dev at lists.iem.at <mailto:pd-dev at lists.iem.at>
> Subject: Re: [PD-dev] Pd-ceammc
> Message-ID:
> 	<20170820080942.Horde.ITpcfe5IO7AJHhkCK4OZ1fB at webmail.iem.at <mailto:20170820080942.Horde.ITpcfe5IO7AJHhkCK4OZ1fB at webmail.iem.at>>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed";
> 	DelSp="Yes"
> 
> 
> Quoting Dan Wilcox <danomatika at gmail.com <mailto:danomatika at gmail.com>>:
>> There could be some solutions for many things worth backporting...
> 
> 
> well, they are releasing the source changes under GPL-3, so  
> backporting is (currently) not possible from a legal pov.

--------
Dan Wilcox
@danomatika <http://twitter.com/danomatika>
danomatika.com <http://danomatika.com/>
robotcowboy.com <http://robotcowboy.com/>



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-dev/attachments/20170820/68a9bd86/attachment.html>


More information about the Pd-dev mailing list