[PD-dev] Pd-ceammc

Dan Wilcox danomatika at gmail.com
Sun Aug 20 19:51:04 CEST 2017

(Sending again, in thread)

Even if a lot of those changes come from Pd-extended? Kind of forward-back-porting?

In any case, I can see a clean diff between this project and the pure-data repository on Github...

> On Aug 20, 2017, at 10:09 AM, pd-dev-request at lists.iem.at <mailto:pd-dev-request at lists.iem.at> wrote:
> Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2017 08:09:42 +0000
> From: zmoelnig at iem.at <mailto:zmoelnig at iem.at>
> To: pd-dev at lists.iem.at <mailto:pd-dev at lists.iem.at>
> Subject: Re: [PD-dev] Pd-ceammc
> Message-ID:
> 	<20170820080942.Horde.ITpcfe5IO7AJHhkCK4OZ1fB at webmail.iem.at <mailto:20170820080942.Horde.ITpcfe5IO7AJHhkCK4OZ1fB at webmail.iem.at>>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed";
> 	DelSp="Yes"
> Quoting Dan Wilcox <danomatika at gmail.com <mailto:danomatika at gmail.com>>:
>> There could be some solutions for many things worth backporting...
> well, they are releasing the source changes under GPL-3, so  
> backporting is (currently) not possible from a legal pov.

Dan Wilcox
@danomatika <http://twitter.com/danomatika>
danomatika.com <http://danomatika.com/>
robotcowboy.com <http://robotcowboy.com/>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-dev/attachments/20170820/a270cbf9/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the Pd-dev mailing list