[PD-dev] Pd-ceammc

[Dan Wilcox]

Ok. At the very least, I can reach out to the authors and see if they would agree to the port.


> On Aug 21, 2017, at 12:00 PM, pd-dev-request at lists.iem.at wrote:
> 
> On 2017-08-20 19:51, Dan Wilcox wrote:
>> (Sending again, in thread)
>> 
>> Even if a lot of those changes come from Pd-extended? Kind of forward-back-porting?
> 
> this doesn't really matter.
> Pd-extended itself aimed towards GPL-3, so a lot of patches for Pd might
> have been distributed under that license.
> 
> having a(ny) pedigree makes re-licensing more complicated, as the number
> of parties that must agree to re-licensing increases.

--------
Dan Wilcox
@danomatika <http://twitter.com/danomatika>
danomatika.com <http://danomatika.com/>
robotcowboy.com <http://robotcowboy.com/>



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-dev/attachments/20170821/5219a29d/attachment.html>