[PD-dev] Pd-ceammc

Dan Wilcox danomatika at gmail.com
Tue Aug 22 02:06:01 CEST 2017

Question posted: https://github.com/uliss/pure-data/issues/46 <https://github.com/uliss/pure-data/issues/46>

> On Aug 21, 2017, at 2:11 PM, Dan Wilcox <danomatika at gmail.com> wrote:
> Ok. At the very least, I can reach out to the authors and see if they would agree to the port.
>> On Aug 21, 2017, at 12:00 PM, pd-dev-request at lists.iem.at <mailto:pd-dev-request at lists.iem.at> wrote:
>> On 2017-08-20 19:51, Dan Wilcox wrote:
>>> (Sending again, in thread)
>>> Even if a lot of those changes come from Pd-extended? Kind of forward-back-porting?
>> this doesn't really matter.
>> Pd-extended itself aimed towards GPL-3, so a lot of patches for Pd might
>> have been distributed under that license.
>> having a(ny) pedigree makes re-licensing more complicated, as the number
>> of parties that must agree to re-licensing increases.

Dan Wilcox
@danomatika <http://twitter.com/danomatika>
danomatika.com <http://danomatika.com/>
robotcowboy.com <http://robotcowboy.com/>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-dev/attachments/20170822/cd9c5ff3/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the Pd-dev mailing list