[PD-dev] 0.48-1 release plans

[Dan Wilcox]

I think I had already fixed this: https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/223 <https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/223> (?) Or am I missing something?

> On Dec 2, 2017, at 8:40 PM, Miller Puckette <msp at ucsd.edu> wrote:
> 
> I had one small ouch: I don't think I can compatibly change t_int to int
> in m_pd.h (this is mentioned on another thread somewhere).  I don't know how
> to make clang pipe down about this short of casting almost every call to
> atom_getint*() in the whole tree.  Yuck...  Maybe it's better just to tell
> clang to be more permissive (if that's possible)?

--------
Dan Wilcox
@danomatika <http://twitter.com/danomatika>
danomatika.com <http://danomatika.com/>
robotcowboy.com <http://robotcowboy.com/>



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-dev/attachments/20171202/56a97453/attachment.html>