[PD-dev] 0.48-1 release plans

[Miller Puckette]

I'm pretty confused about this.  I believe it was "t_int" in 0.48-0, and
I see that your PR changesit from "t_int" to "int" - and I believe
it has to be "t_int" for back compatibility...

cheers
M

On Sat, Dec 02, 2017 at 10:16:44PM +0100, Dan Wilcox wrote:
> I think I had already fixed this: https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/223 <https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/223> (?) Or am I missing something?
> 
> > On Dec 2, 2017, at 8:40 PM, Miller Puckette <msp at ucsd.edu> wrote:
> > 
> > I had one small ouch: I don't think I can compatibly change t_int to int
> > in m_pd.h (this is mentioned on another thread somewhere).  I don't know how
> > to make clang pipe down about this short of casting almost every call to
> > atom_getint*() in the whole tree.  Yuck...  Maybe it's better just to tell
> > clang to be more permissive (if that's possible)?
> 
> --------
> Dan Wilcox
> @danomatika <http://twitter.com/danomatika>
> danomatika.com <http://danomatika.com/>
> robotcowboy.com <http://robotcowboy.com/>
> 
> 
>