[PD-dev] osx -stdlib path

[Alex]

[declare -lib jit_expr] worked on my osx machine.

On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 9:27 AM, Lucas Cordiviola <lucarda27 at hotmail.com>
wrote:

> Can you try on you osx [declare -lib jit_expr] or [declare -lib
> full/path/to/jit_expr]?
>
> I'm not sure if -stdlib is currently covering the
> .../documents/pd/externals/* on all platforms.
>
> see https://puredata.info/docs/faq/how-do-i-install-
> externals-and-help-files for the paths that -stdlib covers.
>
> there's a discussion here : https://github.com/pure-data/
> pure-data/pull/205
>
> ---
>
> I think there will be no name clashes if you keep your [jit_expr] naming.
> If you use [expr] it will clash with Pd's [expr].
>
>
>
> --
>
> Mensaje telepatico asistido por maquinas.
>
> On 2/21/2018 1:50 PM, Alex wrote:
>
> I have an external I've created that I've put into:
> /Users/alex/Documents/Pd/externals/jit_expr/
> the binary is called "jit_expr.pd_darwin"
>
> xnor-work:~/projects/perfect/center$ ls /Users/alex/Documents/Pd/
> externals/jit_expr/
> LICENSE-parser     LICENSE-pd         LICENSE-xnor
> jit_expr-help.pd   jit_expr.pd_darwin
>
> In the binary, the externals themselves are named "jit/expr" "jit/expr~"
> and "jit/fexpr~"
>
> On my work, osX machine, when I [declare -stdlib jit_expr] I then fail to
> create [jit/expr]
> On my home, linux machine, where my external folder is located at
> /home/alex/.local/lib/pd/externals/jit_expr and appropriately named
> jit_expr.pd_linux
> I succeed to create [jit/expr] after [declare -stdlib jit_expr]
>
> Is this a bug am I not following some naming convention that I should be?
>
> I could see wanting to put my external in a folder called "jit" and then
> naming them "expr", "expr~" etc but I could imagine "jit" is more likely to
> collide and so "jit_expr" seemed more reasonable.
> maybe I should just call the whole thing "jit_expr", and just call the
> objects "expr" etc without the prefix in the code and then be able to
> create [jit_expr/expr] with no declare because it'll be in the stdlib
> already?
> Am I confusing conventions that exist for single binary libraries with
> multiple objects and binaries with only one?
>
> Either way, should I file a bug that the behavior isn't the same on osx
> and linux?
>
> thanks,
> Alex
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-dev mailing listPd-dev at lists.iem.athttps://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-dev/attachments/20180221/3e05476c/attachment-0001.html>