[PD-dev] Mac SDK version for externals
Dan Wilcox
danomatika at gmail.com
Mon Mar 19 22:07:11 CET 2018
The compiler builds for the current system by default. You have to set the min deployment target when building.
Add this flag to you makefile: --mmacosx-version-min=10.6
The current version for Pd is 10.6 which is the first version that supported i386 (ie. Intel processors).
> On Mar 19, 2018, at 12:00 PM, pd-dev-request at lists.iem.at wrote:
>
> From: Miller Puckette <msp at ucsd.edu <mailto:msp at ucsd.edu>>
> To: Alex <x37v.alex at gmail.com <mailto:x37v.alex at gmail.com>>
> Cc: pd-dev <pd-dev at lists.iem.at <mailto:pd-dev at lists.iem.at>>
> Subject: Re: [PD-dev] Mac SDK version for externals
> Message-ID: <20180319015755.GY7620 at elroy.localdomain <mailto:20180319015755.GY7620 at elroy.localdomain>>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> This is a very interesting and useful question.
>
> At the outset of PD I only worried about having it run on the "current"
> platforms: Redhat 5.2, Windows 95, and when it arrived, MacOS 10.2. Older
> platforms weren't important.
>
> Since then I've tried to keep back compatibility to whatever those bleeding-edge
> OSes were, because I assume people can't always afford machine upgrades. But
> I haven't tried to extend Pd (Or "extra" objects) backward past the original
> dates.
>
> At the moment I can only compile back to OSX 10.5 (PPC) and Windows XP; I
> don't have real or virtual machines that go back further.
>
> So my suggestion would be: make it work on today's OSes, and try to keep it
> alive on them, but don't worry too hard about older ones. I don't think I'm
> ever going to be tempted to compile Pd for Windows 3.1.
>
> cheers
> Miller
--------
Dan Wilcox
@danomatika <http://twitter.com/danomatika>
danomatika.com <http://danomatika.com/>
robotcowboy.com <http://robotcowboy.com/>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-dev/attachments/20180319/7afd8ae4/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Pd-dev
mailing list