[PD-dev] keep master on github stable

IOhannes m zmoelnig zmoelnig at iem.at
Tue Sep 4 15:46:17 CEST 2018


On 2018-09-04 09:41, Dan Wilcox wrote:
> So the emphasis is based on the predominant use case: in the former, the master as the release and the latter uses master as develop.
+1

my stance is: apart from the "others do it as well", what would be the
benefit for the Pd community? i don't see any.
(but that's just recapitulating what dan has put more nicely)

gfamsdr
IOhannes

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-dev/attachments/20180904/55986969/attachment.sig>


More information about the Pd-dev mailing list