[PD-dev] formatting HTML doc in Pd distro?

[IOhannes m zmoelnig]

On 30.06.19 22:24, Miller Puckette wrote:
>>> But I don't think it's a good idea to put latex compilation in the Pd
>>> compile chain,
>> why?
>>
> ATM I can (and do) compile Pd using only "make", "cc" and "ln" - trying to
> keep the dependencies to an absolute minimum.
> 

hence my suggestion to make the building of the documentation optional.
however, it nevertheless needs to be built at least once, and if you
want to keep your *release workflow* to tools like "ln" (and "cp" and
"mkdir" :-)), the documentation artifacts probably have to be kept in
the repository.

in any case, i'd like to be able to create a bit-by-bit identical
documentation using automated tools from the doc's source-code.

fgmasdr
IOhannes

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-dev/attachments/20190701/46e618e1/attachment.sig>