[PD-dev] a new object/functionality similar to max's [if]

[Alexandre Torres Porres]

Em qua, 31 de jul de 2019 às 08:46, matthew brandi <mfbrandi at outlook.com>
escreveu:

> On 31/07/2019 09:31, Tsz Kiu Pang wrote:
> > Alexandre has recently requested a new object/functionality similar
> > to max's [if] … I am just wondering whether my approach (adding a
> > new class to the [expr], [expr~], [fexpr~] mix) is correct, and
> > whether this functionality is something that we need. I will
> > probably put in a pull request soon if there is no objection
>
>
> Dear TK and Alexandre
>
> I have no objection, but I do have a couple of naïve questions:
>
> [a] In the message case, I am struggling to see the point
>

yup, the point is convenience, and I'd say part of the convenience is that
all the ground is already laid out. In fact, my firs suggestion was to add
a new "ifthen" function to the expr family, but got an objection that
closed the request https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/issues/662


> [b] If a parallel audio case is envisaged, what would it do?
>

there'd no [if~] object
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-dev/attachments/20190731/c04b3de4/attachment.html>