[PD-dev] algo for sequencing merges

Alexandre Torres Porres porres at gmail.com
Sat Nov 30 04:30:31 CET 2019


not sure I got what "adaptation" means here, but I've already mentioned
this PR where I gave a huge cosmetic update to all of Pd's documentation.
You mentioned in the Pd Weekend  you should check it before other changes,
so, well, here it is again:  https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/608
 :)

cheers

Em sex., 29 de nov. de 2019 às 23:08, Miller Puckette <msp at ucsd.edu>
escreveu:

> To pd dev
>
> My default sort algorithm for merging pull requests is oldest to newest.
> I'm making a minor exception to this in taking on the Mac plist thing (I
> hate all things Mac and thus am gratefully taking on Mac-specific PRs with
> no testing) and then, for a wholly different reason, merging the netsend/
> netreceive rewrite (as being something less expert about than the author)
> and
> thinking that getting up to date on network is an adaptation issue and
> not a design enhancement to Pd proper.
>
> Let me know if one of your PRs is indeed just adaptation and not design and
> I'll consider jumping the queue on it like I did these.  Otherwise I think
> I'll crawl through the 73 remaining PRs as best I can in chronological
> order.
>
> Meanwhile I have changes I want to make - still agonizing over these.
>
> cheers
> Miller
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-dev mailing list
> Pd-dev at lists.iem.at
> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-dev/attachments/20191130/af075ceb/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Pd-dev mailing list