[PD-dev] no longer able to "send" to UDP -- correction

[Dan Wilcox]

I wasn't aware that was supported and we didn't remove any existing capability, as far as I know. Sending via [netreceive] with TCP works as before.

As Christof says, if there were obvious commits we can certainly (re_integrate them if they were lost along the line.

> On Mar 28, 2020, at 12:00 PM, pd-dev-request at lists.iem.at wrote:
> 
> Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2020 22:35:08 -0700
> From: Miller Puckette <msp at ucsd.edu <mailto:msp at ucsd.edu>>
> To: pd-dev at iem.at <mailto:pd-dev at iem.at>
> Subject: Re: [PD-dev] no longer able to "send" to UDP -- correction
> Message-ID: <20200328053508.GA9452 at ucsd.edu <mailto:20200328053508.GA9452 at ucsd.edu>>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> 
> correction: I forgot that Roman's netpd uses iemnet, not netsend/netreceive,
> which I guess is why his jack~ implementation is working better than mine.
> I can switch over as well, so I don't have any urgent need to send replies
> from netreceive -u to netsend -u as I had thought.
> 
> It would still be good if the new netsend/receive were able to do this, both
> to maintain 0.50 compatibility, and to allow vanilla-only access to that
> ability.

--------
Dan Wilcox
@danomatika <http://twitter.com/danomatika>
danomatika.com <http://danomatika.com/>
robotcowboy.com <http://robotcowboy.com/>



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-dev/attachments/20200328/19108a7b/attachment.html>