[PD-dev] -stderr garbled

[Antoine Rousseau]

Sorry, my fault I guess, i didn't test with -stderr...
I can try to fix, but not before the end of the week.


Le lun. 23 août 2021 à 12:53, Christof Ressi <info at christofressi.com> a
écrit :

> Hi,
>
> in this commit, "print_anything()" and "print_list()" now (ab)uses the new
> "startlogpost()" function for printing individual pd atoms. However, for
> "-stderr" and custom printhooks this will accidentally print "verbose(2) "
> before each atom.
>
> I would suggest to add another function "logatom()" - analogous to
> "postatom()" - which would only print the atom (without a newline) and omit
> the "verbose(N) " header.
>
> Christof
> On 23.08.2021 10:50, Roman Haefeli wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> Since f16dd5ec34 (I believe) everything printed to stderr is garbled.
> For instance, when doing:
>
> [list a b 12(
> |
> [print]
>
> in 'pd -stderr', I get:
>
> ~~~
> verbose(2): print: listverbose(2):  averbose(2):  bverbose(2):  12
> ~~~
>
> Without '-stderr', the print output looks fine in the Pd console.
>
> Roman
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-dev mailing listPd-dev at lists.iem.athttps://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-dev mailing list
> Pd-dev at lists.iem.at
> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-dev/attachments/20210823/7ddd7db4/attachment.htm>