[PD-dev] pd 0.52-2 release plan

Alexandre Torres Porres porres at gmail.com
Mon Mar 28 05:15:16 CEST 2022


Em qui., 24 de mar. de 2022 às 11:05, Dan Wilcox <danomatika at gmail.com>
escreveu:

> I think it's worth documenting it as a debuting tool, since that's what
> it's there for, as far as I can tell for Miller's response.
>

I tried the flag and I couldn't really see any difference... Miller also
said "*one should always use the default, binary connection.*" so I really
don't know what to do here... if I could at least have seen the difference
when I tried it...

but anyway, I can just go ahead and write exactly something you people
think it's best, just tell me here what to say =>
https://github.com/pure-data/pddp/issues/60

cheers



>
> On Mar 24, 2022, at 12:00 PM, pd-dev-request at lists.iem.at wrote:
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2022 17:39:36 -0300
> From: Alexandre Torres Porres <porres at gmail.com>
> To: Miller Puckette <msp at ucsd.edu>
> Cc: pd-dev <pd-dev at lists.iem.at>
> Subject: Re: [PD-dev] pd 0.52-2 release plan
> Message-ID:
> <CAEAsFmhxRSpD5pLg0TBjxH08Ugo1zw7LQV2jv=+1arDdBA0m5w at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Not sure it's worth documenting then... I should test and see it for myself
> how it works so I actually get it.
>
> keeping it as a hidden feature for now.
>
>
> --------
> Dan Wilcox
> @danomatika <http://twitter.com/danomatika>
> danomatika.com
> robotcowboy.com
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-dev/attachments/20220328/baee6a26/attachment.htm>


More information about the Pd-dev mailing list