[PD-dev] call for discussion double-precision file extension

[IOhannes m zmoelnig]

On 3/29/22 20:03, Lucas Cordiviola wrote:
> Joining the discussion:
> 
> I think the "deken-specifier" is Ok.


here's something i just came up with:
what would the deken-specifier be for fat-binaries (on macOS).

i do not want to have zexy.darwin-amd64-32.darwin-arm64-32.so
(the reason is practicability: Pd constructs the filename beforehand, 
and then tries to open the file. but in this example, we do not really 
know whether the filename is "zexy.darwin-amd64-32.darwin-arm64-32.so" 
or "zexy.darwin-arm64-32.darwin-amd64-32.so" or 
"zexy.darwin-arm64-32.darwin-ppc-32.darwin-amd64-32.so")


we obviously could ditch fat binaries in this case altogether (not sure 
whether this is a good idea though).

gfmas
IOhannes
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OpenPGP_signature
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 840 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-dev/attachments/20220330/ff8dd235/attachment.sig>