[PD-dev] call for discussion double-precision file extension

[Christof Ressi]

> but i don't really see how it would help with fat binaries. 
Two solutions that come to my mind:

1) just use an ugly folder name:

foo.pd/darwin-amd64-32.darwin-arm64-32/foo.dylib

Typically, the user won't see it :-)

2) use a special specifier for universal binaries:

foo.pd/darwin-universal-32/foo.dylib


On 30.03.2022 16:33, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
>
> On 3/30/22 16:16, Christof Ressi wrote:
>>>
>>> i do not want to have zexy.darwin-amd64-32.darwin-arm64-32.so 
>> maybe a bundle structure (as described in 
>> https://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-dev/2022-03/022997.html) 
>> might not be such a bad idea after all?
>
> maybe.
> it solves problems like auxiliary libraries and keeps the directory 
> reasonably clean.
>
> but i don't really see how it would help with fat binaries.
>
> dgfmsfa
> IOhannes
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-dev mailing list
> Pd-dev at lists.iem.at
> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev