[PD-dev] multichannel signals, preliminary support

Alexandre Torres Porres porres at gmail.com
Tue Jan 17 05:30:19 CET 2023


Wow, [clone]'s nem multichannel functionalities are quite cool and amusing
indeed. I always wanted to be able to have [clone] output parallel
processing - like having white noise being filtered in parallel with a
filterbank and then having access to each output instead of the sum. This
finally makes it happen with the '-d' flag, which is amazing! But in order
to do this I have to copy a single input into a multichannel array with
[pack~] and I wonder if this can be simplified by using yet a new flag
where a single signal inlet~ can be distributed to all copies and a
multichannel is output. Maybe not worth the hassle, but maybe it could be
more significantly efficient? If it's not significantly efficient then it
would be just a bit more convenient.

Em ter., 17 de jan. de 2023 às 00:24, Miller Puckette via Pd-dev <
pd-dev at lists.iem.at> escreveu:

> To Pd dev -
>
> I've pushed what I think is working support for multichannel signals.  Many
> objects haven't yet been adapted to deal with them, but there are enough to
> at least test the concepts: lop~, send~, receive~, and (ugh) clone are
> multichannel-aware, and new pack~ and unpack~ objects are provided to
> combine and split signal channels.
>
> I've put a couple of example patches on
> http://msp.ucsd.edu/tmp/multichannel-tests.tgz
> ... the interplay between multichannel inlets and outlets and clone
> are sometimes amusing.
>
> cheers
> Miller
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-dev mailing list
> Pd-dev at lists.iem.at
> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-dev/attachments/20230117/58836395/attachment.htm>


More information about the Pd-dev mailing list