[PD-dev] Removing [output~]? (was [clone] with subpatches)

Dan Wilcox danomatika at gmail.com
Fri Jan 20 17:35:01 CET 2023


Looks good to me. It seems similar to the rjlib [soundinput] and [soundoutput] abstractions which I use with PdParty:



> On Jan 20, 2023, at 1:09 AM, pd-dev-request at lists.iem.at wrote:
> 
> This seems simple, better and is more versatile and seems like a good
> candidate for a new Vanilla [output~] abstraction that is really useful for
> day to day usage. See screenshot below and find the patch attached. Please
> give me feedback to see if I'm going in the right direction. If it is ok I
> will make a PR and update the documentation.
> 
> 
> [image: Screen Shot 2023-01-19 at 21.07.18.png]

--------
Dan Wilcox
@danomatika <http://twitter.com/danomatika>
danomatika.com <http://danomatika.com/>
robotcowboy.com <http://robotcowboy.com/>



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-dev/attachments/20230120/15da5dad/attachment-0001.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Screen Shot 2023-01-20 at 5.33.02 PM.png
Type: image/png
Size: 58229 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-dev/attachments/20230120/15da5dad/attachment-0001.png>


More information about the Pd-dev mailing list