[PD-dev] pack~/unpack~ (was Re: multichannel signals, preliminary support)

[Roman Haefeli]

On Mon, 2023-01-23 at 08:40 +0100, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
> 
> i would prefer this.
> howe about the [split~]/[merge~] pair suggested by Jean-Yves?

I think those are more descriptive names, regardless of the name
collision problem.

+ 1

> in retrospect i wouldn't have named the zexy objects like i did, but
> i 
> was young and needed the money.

I don't think 'pack~' and 'unpack~' fit any less to what zexy's objects
do. Like their non-tilde counterparts, they pack to lists und unpack
from lists. I think those names are quite good.

Roman

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-dev/attachments/20230123/d83919c0/attachment.sig>