two questions
Guenter Geiger
geiger at epy.co.at
Thu May 6 23:46:35 CEST 1999
Christian Feldbauer writes:
> When I´m using float-constants as arguments for objects (or messages),
> pd truncates them extremely !
> So it´s not possible to make for example a filter (biquad~) with a
> desired frequency response.
>
> Don´t you think the length is too short ?
Well, I think extremely is a little bit exagerated. As of my
knowning, with floats we have a resolution of +/- 8 Million,
which are 7 decimal digits in the mantissa. (Well not the full range
of 7 digits). Pd truncates numbers to six digits, although it could
do 7 in most cases.
Corrections welcome if I'm wrong ...
>
> 2) missing "refer to another table"-function for table-objects
> In my opinion it is very useful to can switch to another table (array)
> (set -function or int (float) -function).
>
> What´s the reason for taking away this functions (I´v seen the dead code
> in d_array.c)?
Hmm, well for tabwrite~, tabread~ there is a set function, at least
in the newest version, others I don't know, prob. should be added
there too ?
Guenter
More information about the Pd-list
mailing list