notes on a day with gem

[Mark Danks]

  Hmm, can't say that I know what the problem is, since I am still
working on Linux yet.

  However, next week, gem 0.81 is going to be released (sorry that 0.80
for un*x got skipped).  Things might work better there...

  By the way, the "no rule to make target "../Base/m_pd.h"" means that
the makefile didn't realize that m_pd.h is really over in pd/src (ie, it
isn't a GEM file).  Sounds like the dependencies got screwed up.

Later, Mark

----------------------------------------
-- Mark Danks
-- mdanks at stormfront.com
-- http://www.danks.org/mark
---------------------------------------- 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: 73.WrZ_zBl_5.67 [mailto:opt at web.fm]
> Sent: Friday, August 20, 1999 5:57 AM
> To: pd-list at iem.mhsg.ac.at
> Subject: notes on a day with gem
> 
> 
> hu!
> 
> just to have more traffic on the list .. ;)
> 
> gem-0.79-2 for linxu:
> could absolutely not manage to cvompile it, with very 
> mysterious errors
> like:
> No rule to make target "../Base/m_pd.h" needed by CPPExtern.o ..
> or:
> No rule blabla target 
> "/usr/lib/gcc-lib/alpha-linux/egcs-2.91.66/include/stddef.h"
> where its looking for alpha secific inc filez?
> any attempts trying to resolve this just went down to 
> downloading version
> 0.79-1 ... ;) which did ok , sort of ..
> 
> also gem/pd like to crash when you "destroy" the gemwin or 
> just close a
> patchwindow , especially the eamples or custom made "more 
> complex" stuff,
> not so wiht simple hewlp files .. naja.
> 
> and finally, if i wanna load Gem and ggext, how d i go abvout that?
> just load gem from commandline -lib Gem and insert a "ggext" 
> object into
> the patch? or DO mutliple -lib flags work ?
> 
> ok, ltr. .. so
> 
> --
> 
>