paf~ in an abstraction

[Miller Puckette]

Hi Francois,

I've just been loading paf~s into abstractions in the last week...  The
only thing to watch is that there isn't a path problem; perhaps for
some reason the abstraction isn't finding paf~ because the search path in
the abstraction is different from that of the "owning" patch.  However, I
don't know how you would get the paths to be different!  What I do in
situations like this is to put everything in the same directory, verify
that it works that way, and then go back and try to make it work with the
files organized "correctly".

By the way, I've just discovered that PAF 0.5 has a problem with clicks
if the frequency or bandwidth are changed suddenly.  I've fixed that in 
my copy but you won't see the fix until I get release 0.31 together.

cheers
Miller

On Sat, Mar 18, 2000 at 10:32:27PM +0100, F.Ernst wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> With PD 0.30 I have a problem with paf~ 
> 
> When paf~ is used in an abstraction loaded from the disk included in a
> patch you get:
> 
>  paf~
> ... couldn't create
> 
> 
> But if before that, you load a patch which contains directly a paf~
> opcode it will work.
> 
> 
> Francois Ernst