Netreceive and TCP/Windows

Guenter Geiger geiger at epy.co.at
Wed Jun 28 13:32:33 CEST 2000




Hi,

There is a "TCP_NODELAY" call on WinXX which should at least improve
performance for NT->Linux and NT->NT.

TCP_NODELAY exists for Linux too, but I'm not sure if this improves 
the situation.

I have changed a few things in the net code, to make it more secure
on Linux (no hassle with reserved ports if the application stops
without disconnect and the like)

I will sort these things out for 0.31 and will sent patches to miller,
which are in a managable, understandable form in the near future.

Meanwhile if someone wants to try my current x_net.c .. it is
attached.

No guaranties for anything, though.

Guenter


PS:
 more things to come
  - running pd without a gui 

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: x_net.c
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 8074 bytes
Desc: hacke x_net
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20000628/93f5af3f/attachment.obj>
-------------- next part --------------


=?iso-8859-1?Q?S=F8ren_Bovbjerg?= writes:
 > Hi
 > 
 > I couldn't help notice that Netreceive runs quite badly with TCP on Windows95/98 (but otherwise fine on my Linux box). Is this a Win95/98 issue or is it also a problem with WinNT? (I mean, PD is not really a win9x program, is it?)
 > 
 > Linux Netsend to Win9x Netreceive gives very laggy data while the other way works fine. Strangely enough I have no problem with the UDP port at all (!!?)
 > 
 > Any comments??
 > 
 > S?ren
 > 
 > 


More information about the Pd-list mailing list