performance in pd - audiobuf, etc

[d d]

Hi Ricardo,
So simply running a line level source thru MSP then straight out gave you 50 
ms?
Interesting, thank you for the information, I've no way to test that myself
-daniel

>I got these results now, 11.dec.2000:
>G3/350 Blue- Motu2408 mkII
>Driver: ASIO PCI-324
>
>In-out latency test:
>2226 samples = 50.476189 ms
>
>Delay lines:
>74 samples  = 1.678005 ms
>
>I have also found the fact that midi behaviour is quite unstable
>when using OMS, the Miditimepiece(USB) MTP AV under Macos 8.6
>and running MaxMSP.
>
>Ricardo
>
>-------------------------------------------------
># On Mon, 11 Dec 2000, Michael Lechasseur wrote:
>#
># >
># > 	Perhaps you could dual boot to Linux?  I don't have any latency data 
>for PD
># > on Win2000, but if you'd like to write a latency test patch, I could 
>run it
># > on my system and send you the results?
># >
># > 	I've wanted to test this since applying the kernel low-latency patch, 
>and
># > have never gotten around to it.
># >
># > 	I have an Athlon 600, 64MB Ram, Redhat 6.2, Kernel 2.2.16 with the
># > low-latency patch.
># >
># > > -----Original Message-----
># > > From: d d [mailto:denglertdp at hotmail.com]
># > > Sent: Monday, December 11, 2000 1:02 PM
># > > To: pd-list at iem.kug.ac.at
># > > Subject: performance in pd - audiobuf, etc
># > >
># > >
># > > Hello, I'm new to PD, and have been using it sporadically for
># > > several weeks.
># > > It is extremely interesting, seems to do the things I can't do with 
>my
># > > NordModular. My thanks to all who made it possible!
># > >
># > > I know you probably don't want to hear this question again, but I was
># > > wondering if there was a way to get real time audio processing
># > > performance
># > > out of PD. (windows 2000 pent III 500mHz, awe64, echo layla 20bit)
># > >
># > > I've tried adjusting all the command params, disabling devices, 
>changing
># > > audiobuf, etc
># > >
># > > Is there anyway to knock the latency to hardware like levels on
># > > my system?
># > > Even if the answer is different hardware, OS, etc
># > > I'm considering a Mac purchase because cycling74 claims w/
># > > certain hardware
># > > a 6ms latency can be had.
># > > Is anything this low possible with PD?
># > > I'd much rather stay within windows.
># > >
># > > Sorry for the bother with this question
># > >
># > > I'd like to have this ultimate control over processing/creating
># > > that PD can
># > > give, but I also need hardware like latency In/Out
># > > I don't want to spend money on a Kyma, because it seems logical that 
>a PC
># > > can do this sort of thing these days (what with the nifty fast chips 
>and
># > > all)
># > >
># > > Thanks all who read this far, sorry for the dull question
># > > -daniel
># > > _________________________________________________________________
># > > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
># > >
># >
># >
>#
># --
># _____________________________________________________
># | Karl W. MacMillan                                 |
># | Computer Music Department                         |
># | Peabody Institute of the Johns Hopkins University |
># | karlmac at peabody.jhu.edu                           |
># | www.peabody.jhu.edu/~karlmac                      |
># -----------------------------------------------------
>#
>#
>
>
>
>

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com