[PD] stereo vibrato-delay

Frank Barknecht barknech at ph-cip.uni-koeln.de
Fri Sep 14 10:11:41 CEST 2001


Krzysztof Czaja hat gesagt: // Krzysztof Czaja wrote:

> the short answer would be to look at
> 
> ...doc/3.audio.examples/72.execution.order.pd
> 
> If packing into subpaches is inconvenient, then you should somehow
> (by means of cutting/pasting or, if you like, hacking vibrato~.pd
> file in a text editor) reorder tilde objects in such a way, that
> root object of the subgraph containing vd~s ([osc~ $1] in your case)
> will precede root objects of delwrite~ subgraphs (your inlets~).

Indeed: As soon as I put the osc~ before the delwrites in my patch I get
vibrato on both channels. I never dug 72.execution.order.pd, but now things
become clear. But 72.execution.order.pd also says, that there could be a 64
samples delay with throw~/catch~ pairs. Now I'll have to check this in my 
patches again, sigh.

Thanks for your help,
-- 
                                                 __    __
 Frank Barknecht       ____ ______   ____ __ trip\ \  / /wire ______
                      / __// __  /__/ __// // __  \ \/ /  __ \\  ___\	
                     / /  / ____/  / /  / // ____// /\ \\  ___\\____ \	
                    /_/  /_____/  /_/  /_//_____// /  \ \\_____\\_____\
                                                /_/    \_\ 



More information about the Pd-list mailing list