[PD] stereo vibrato-delay
Frank Barknecht
barknech at ph-cip.uni-koeln.de
Fri Sep 14 10:11:41 CEST 2001
Krzysztof Czaja hat gesagt: // Krzysztof Czaja wrote:
> the short answer would be to look at
>
> ...doc/3.audio.examples/72.execution.order.pd
>
> If packing into subpaches is inconvenient, then you should somehow
> (by means of cutting/pasting or, if you like, hacking vibrato~.pd
> file in a text editor) reorder tilde objects in such a way, that
> root object of the subgraph containing vd~s ([osc~ $1] in your case)
> will precede root objects of delwrite~ subgraphs (your inlets~).
Indeed: As soon as I put the osc~ before the delwrites in my patch I get
vibrato on both channels. I never dug 72.execution.order.pd, but now things
become clear. But 72.execution.order.pd also says, that there could be a 64
samples delay with throw~/catch~ pairs. Now I'll have to check this in my
patches again, sigh.
Thanks for your help,
--
__ __
Frank Barknecht ____ ______ ____ __ trip\ \ / /wire ______
/ __// __ /__/ __// // __ \ \/ / __ \\ ___\
/ / / ____/ / / / // ____// /\ \\ ___\\____ \
/_/ /_____/ /_/ /_//_____// / \ \\_____\\_____\
/_/ \_\
More information about the Pd-list
mailing list