shoutcast~ lin

Yves Degoyon ydegoyon at free.fr
Tue Nov 27 16:26:54 CET 2001


I'll take a look at this problem quite soon...
but I can't today,
one of my friend crashed his Window$ system.

later,

Yves/

----- Original Message -----
From: "Olaf Matthes" <olaf.matthes at gmx.de>
To: "-¯-" <jdl at xdv.org>
Cc: "smoerk" <smoerk at gmx.de>; "pd-list" <pd-list at iem.kug.ac.at>; "Yves
Degoyon" <ydegoyon at free.fr>
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 3:43 PM
Subject: Re: shoutcast~ lin


> Well, I don't have Linux to test it but the Windows version works without
> crackles. So it can't (?) be a problem concerning the audio buffers of
> shoutcast~, I think, since they use the same code.
> Probably a problem with sending data via TCP on Linux? shoutcast~ should
> display a message in case data is not sent correctly (lines 214 to 229 in
> shoutcast~.c). Does 'send' on Linux give the same return value (i.e.
number
> of bytes sent)?
>
> To test if crackles are related to buffer size you could try to compile
with
> say double buffer size (MY_MP3_MALLOC_IN_SIZE in line 64). Then crackles
> should occur half that often... If they still occur in same frequency it
> might be a problem of mp3 encoding which is done differently on linux.
> Or try to increase x->x_lamechunk = 1024 in line 884 to 2304 (which is the
> amount of data we send LAME on win when encoding in 48kHz, 224kbit).
>
>
> Olaf
>
> -¯- schrieb:
>
> >  |On Tue, 27 Nov 2001 00:02:36 +0100 (CET), _-¯-_ wrote:
> >  |
> >  |> |let me know how it works...
> >  |>
> >  |>hm, can't seem to get a  clean signal out of it so far
> >  |>have been trying on a proper machine now, at 48000, 128kbit stereo
but
> >  |>still those crackels (on frame boundaries?)
> >  |
> >  |i think i have the same problem. please listen to
> >  |http://radiostudio.org:8000/puredata
> >  |
> >  |i'm using the linux version.
> >
> > i also checked the date's of the files i was using yesterday and it
> > seems they were the  latest versions (nov 26, 14.20) right from the
> > start ..
> >
> > -- > < d V .  O r G
>
>





More information about the Pd-list mailing list