[PD] +~?

[pix]

or you could even just change the +~ object into a [/~ n] object, and put
all of the inputs in the first inlet, since all the audio streams on an
inlet get summed automatically. except for the [+~ int] usage, the +~
object is usually redundant.

debatable if it "improves readability"... for example, adding 40 audio
streams together in a  binary tree of [+~] objects probably isn't the most
elegant visual representation.

does anyone know which way is more efficient? potentially the "all in one
inlet" approach could be (since pd knows more about what is really going
on).

On 28 Dec 2001 14:41:55 -0800
"Andrew (Andy) W. "Schmeder <andy at eh2o.ws> wrote:

> ...
> 
> > mixing them. This is most pronounced when at higher volumes. I thought
> > that I might be overloading my amplifier, but it acts the same if 
> > listened to through headphones.
> 
> If the sample values going into [dac~] are outside of [-1, 1] then you
> are clipping the signal... (that's the soundcard clipping not the amp)
> solution; place before the dac~, [/~ n] for n = the number of signals
> you've added together.
> 
> 
> andy