[PD] sfplay bug?
mpuckett at man104-1.ucsd.edu
Sun Jan 6 00:03:58 CET 2002
Hmm, I'm hoping to get readsf~/writesf~ working on Windows someday... if
I can get this together we migth not need sfplay~ so badly.
On Sat, Jan 05, 2002 at 12:38:16PM +0100, Krzysztof Czaja wrote:
> this is true, and the needed fix seems to be minor: in sfplay_open()
> move x->please_close = 0; outside of if(x->state != SFPLAY_WAIT) block.
> But the sad story is this: who is going to fix that?
> And another, even more sad, story is this: the above fix applies to
> ggee/sfplay~, but since you refer to a tilde-less sfplay, it might be
> you are talking about zexy/sfplay, which is slightly different (I have
> not looked at zexy to check if this fix applies)?
> Since sfplay~ is the one most badly needed external (at least for Windows
> users), maybe it is time to clean up sfplay~ and incorporate it into Pd
> proper (probably under a different name, to avoid confusion with much
> more versatile max/sfplay~)?
> "Andrew (Andy) W. Schmeder" wrote:
> > If you send [sfplay] a 'close' message when there is no file open, then
> > it will ignore the next 'open' message.
More information about the Pd-list