[PD] boxless graphs?
mpuckett at man104-1.ucsd.edu
Wed Feb 20 06:47:17 CET 2002
I don't understand this, sorry..
Do you just mean graphs without the drawn rectangular border??? Or
something deeper that I'm not understanding yet...?
On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 05:44:17PM +0100, Krzysztof Czaja wrote:
> hi Miller,
> would you consider providing a mechanism for boxless graphs?
> I.e. the graphs with non-text widgetbehavior when in !x->gl_isgraph
> state. It is now important for me to know, whether something like
> that is planned for the future, or if this is just a wild silly idea.
> The reason is mainly selfish: not having such mechanism hampers my
> efforts both to design a poly~-alike external, and to finish coding
> `vex_multi' thing -- a vector collection being part of vexing library
> (release postponed, sorry).
> Btw. it is a bit confusing to have a [graph] box left after clearing
> show-on-parent property of a graph, like one with an array in it, or
> one created with `graph' message to canvas, etc., while there is no
> such thing -- one cannot type "graph" into a box to make a graph.
> I am not suggesting that graphs other than subcanvases should be
> boxless, but either clearing their graph-on-parent flag should be
> prohibited, or text shown in the box should reflect a valid message
> to objectmaker.
More information about the Pd-list